术语“同群感”的详细信息
数据项 Items | 术语信息 Info. |
---|---|
汉语术语编号 Term No. | 85000786 |
所属学科 Subject | 民族学 Ethnology |
汉语术语词性 POS | n. |
汉语术语分词 Segmentation | 同群感/ |
汉语术语长度 Length | 1 |
关联术语表达 Association | |
搭配信息 Collocation | |
编纂人 Compiler | 方紫意 |
编纂日期 Date of Compilation | 2016-06-20 00:00:00 |
汉英语境1
英译术语:
we-feeling
汉语语境:
传统安全主要指的是以国家为主体的安全,安全的内容局限于军事和政治领域,涉及的都是敏感的国家主权、领土完整等核心利益问题,传统安全范式使国家之间面临着“零和博弈”和“安全困境”的结构性难题,这正是中国与印度之间难以形成关于安全的共同认知和共同利益的关键所在,更遑论“我们感”和集体身份的构建了。而由于非传统安全来源的不确定性和行为体的多样化,需要参与合作的主体将更为多元化,合作层次和合作方式也更为灵活多样,双方容易达成一致立场和看法,有利于促进地区性身份认同的构建和“我们感”的形成。
英语语境:
What the tradition security mainly is take the country as the main security subject, the content limits to the military and the political fields, involves sensitive core benefit and national sovereignty, territorial integrity, the traditional security model causes the country to face the constructive problem, such a “Zero-sum Game“ and “Security Dilemma“ .That's why China and India can't form a safe common cognition and the common interest between them, let alone the form of“ we-feeling“ and the construction of collective status. However, by virtue of different causes and variety of subject, non- traditional security demand diversified partners, the variety of cooperation level and patterns.The common view can be achieved, it favor the construct of regional identity and the “we-feeling“.