术语“定量研究”的详细信息

数据项 Items 术语信息 Info.
汉语术语编号 Term No. 86000096
所属学科 Subject 新闻传播学 Journalism & Communication
汉语术语词性 POS n.
汉语术语分词 Segmentation 定量/研究/
汉语术语长度 Length 2
关联术语表达 Association
搭配信息 Collocation
编纂人 Compiler 王丹琳
编纂日期 Date of Compilation 2015-07-31 00:00:00

汉英语境1


英译术语:

quantitative analysis


汉语语境:

近20年来,中国社会学在理论研究与实证研究、定性研究与定量研究、总体性研究与分支研究、社会学的本土化等方面都得到了迅速发展。面向21 世纪的社会学需要进一步树立学术规范;完善学科体系的建设;加强对城市社会学、经济社会学、组织社会学、社会学研究方法等分支学科的研究与教学;在培养高层次研究人员的同时,注重培养社会调查、社区管理、社会保障、社会工作、社会政策等应用型人才。


英语语境:

In the recent two decades, sociology experienced a period of flourish development in Mainland China. Fruitful achievements had been gained in the areas of theoretical and empirical researches, qualitative and quantitative analyses, general and specific sociology, as well as sociological localization. Facing the 21st century, the author suggests that emphasis should be attached to the following issues: establishing academic norms, perfecting the construction of academic system, enhancing researches and teaching in urban sociology, sociology of economics, sociology of organization and sociological research methods. The author also proposes that more applied sociologists be nurtured in areas of social survey, community administration, social security, social work and social policy. High level sociological researchers should be trained, too.


汉英语境2


英译术语:

quantitative study


汉语语境:

定性与定量研究是社会科学研究领域中的两大主要范式,二者既存在较大的差别,但是也互相联系,具有结合的可能性。定性与定量研究的结合可以在研究视角、研究设计、具体研究方法等不同层面结合,从此发挥两类范式的各自优点,组成最适合研究所需的混合研究模式。与国际心理学研究先进水平相比,我国心理学研究在定量与定性两方面均存在较大的差距,两种研究范式之间又缺乏交流与借鉴,这极大地限制了我国心理学研究的进一步整合。


英语语境:

Qualitative and quantitative studies are two main paradigms in social science study. They share some components, though differ in many aspects. There are different categories to integrate them, such as points of view, study designs and research methods. It is of great value to psychology in China to discuss the issue of the integration of qualitative and quantitative research in the current time. Because there is a large gap between psychology in China and that of the world both in quantitative and qualitative researches, while the two paradigms lack of exchange and reference in China.